23.0225° N 72.6841° E GIFT CITY, GUJARAT WHERE INDIA'S SETTLEMENT STACK GETS REBUILT

The interbank
settlement system
India's cross-border
payment deserved.

DOC REF GILON/WP/2026.04
Institutional Overview
MECHANISM Deferred Net
Multilateral Settlement
JURISDICTION GIFT-IFSC, India
IFSCA
ACCESS By application,
institutional only
01NETTING
0.0%
Obligation compression, observed
02FINALITY
T+0 · intraday
Irrevocable settlement window
03ADDRESSABLE
USD 0.0Tn
Indian cross-border corridor, 2026
04STANDARD
PFMI · CPMI–IOSCO
Principles compliant, Tier-1 FMI
01 / The Problem
Bilateral gross settlement forces every bank to post liquidity it does not need, against obligations that largely offset.
₹187Tn
Annual gross bilateral interbank settlement obligations, India. Of which an estimated 82% is economically redundant — offsetting flows that settle independently, each drawing down nostro liquidity.

Every working day, scheduled commercial banks in India settle hundreds of thousands of bilateral cross-border obligations on a gross basis — each trade moving in full across correspondent rails, each leg demanding its own liquidity line.

The result is an interbank market that is mechanically illiquid long before it is economically illiquid: balance sheets swollen with intraday float, credit lines committed to pay flows that a counterparty is simultaneously paying back.

GILON removes the redundancy. A single netting cycle collapses the gross obligation set into one net position per participant, settled once, with finality, inside the IFSC settlement window.

Bilateral Gross — Legacy est. 1970s · correspondent rails
GILON Multilateral Net GIFT-IFSC · 2026
01Settlement Flows per cycle
n × (n−1) directed legs
For 20 counterparties: 380 directed payment legs, each initiated and acknowledged across correspondent banks.
n net positions, once.
A single net debit or credit per participant, novated to the CCP-model settlement agent. 20 participants → 20 instructions.
02Intraday Liquidity required
Sum of all gross outflows
Participants pre-fund against each counterparty independently; liquidity is duplicated across obligations that, by construction, offset.
Net obligation, only.
Mean compression observed at 94.7%. Liquidity released is redeployable in the same business day.
03Counterparty Exposure model
Bilateral, uncollateralised
Each pair carries its own Herstatt-type and replacement-cost exposure through the settlement window.
Centralised, collateralised.
Novated to GILON's default-managed settlement agent; margined under a PFMI-aligned risk waterfall.
04Settlement Finality window
T+1 / T+2, jurisdictional
Dependent on correspondent cut-off windows and the weaker of the two legal regimes involved.
T+0, intraday, IFSCA.
Single jurisdictional finality under the PSS Act, 2007, via the IFSC Settlement System.
The net result: 94.7% fewer flows, 82% of intraday liquidity freed, one jurisdiction of finality — where there were four bilateral failure modes.
Filed · GILON Ledger · Cycle 0412
01.1 / The Scale
What compression releases, measured against a representative Tier-1 participant cycle.
A
₹12,000Cr
Daily settlement float currently locked in offsetting bilateral obligations across the corridor.
B
82%
Mean intraday liquidity freed per participant after multilateral netting, redeployable same-day.
C
20→5
Flow compression per cycle. Twenty gross directed legs collapse to five net settlement instructions.

"The case for multilateral netting is not that it is faster. It is that the alternative asks participants to carry liquidity against obligations that, by construction, do not exist." — IFSCA Working Paper on FMI Efficiency, 2025

02 / The Netting Engine

Click any institution.
Watch what netting does.

Each node represents a settlement participant. In a bilateral world, every institution settles with every other — individually, expensively, redundantly. Click a node to see GILON collapse that into one.

◼ SIMULATION · NETTING CYCLE 0412 5 PARTICIPANTS · 20 GROSS FLOWS
← CLICK ANY NODE →
~80–85%
THEORETICAL COMPRESSION
Per cycle, consistent with CPMI benchmarks for dense multilateral payment networks.
Source: BIS CPMI, 2024
20 → 5
FLOW REDUCTION
Per netting cycle across a 5-participant network. n(n−1) directed legs collapse to n net positions.
Source: GILON engine, 5-participant network
T+0
INTRADAY FINALITY
Irrevocable settlement inside the IFSC window, under IFSCA supervision.
Source: PSS Act 2007 §23 · IFSCA GIFT-IFSC
DATA — BIS CPMI observations on multilateral netting efficiency, 2024 · IFSCA (Payment and Settlement Systems) Regulations, 2024 · PSS Act 2007 §23 (settlement finality) · Bank labels indicative; network composition illustrative.
GILON · GIFT-IFSC · 2026
03 / Regulatory Framework
GILON is being developed under the authorisation framework established by IFSCA in October 2024 — the first dedicated statutory regime for payment system operators within GIFT-IFSC.
Current Status
Authorisation Application — In Preparation
GILON is preparing its application for authorisation as a Payment System Operator under Regulation 4, IFSCA (Payment and Settlement Systems) Regulations, 2024. No authorisation has been granted at this stage.
Enabling Regulation
F.No. IFSCA/GN/2024/009
Notified 14 October 2024

§ 03.01IFSCA

International Financial Services Centres Authority — unified regulator for all financial services within GIFT-IFSC. Established under the IFSCA Act, 2019.

GILON's authorisation pathway is governed by the IFSCA (Payment and Settlement Systems) Regulations, 2024, notified 14 October 2024 under F.No. IFSCA/GN/2024/009. The authorisation process involves in-principle approval followed by an Authorisation Certificate upon satisfaction of all statutory conditions.

§ 03.02PFMI

Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures — CPMI–IOSCO international standards for systemically important payment systems, CCPs, CSDs, and trade repositories.

Under Regulation 8 of the IFSCA PSS Regulations 2024, every System Provider must comply on an ongoing basis with the 24 PFMI Principles. GILON is being designed from inception to satisfy these standards — covering credit risk, liquidity risk, settlement finality, and default management.

§ 03.03PSS Act, 2007

The Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 — the foundational statute under which payment systems in India are authorised and regulated.

Under Regulation 14 of the IFSCA PSS Regulations 2024, the PSS Act 2007 continues to apply within the IFSC as carried forward. Section 23 of the PSS Act provides the statutory basis for settlement finality and irrevocability — the legal foundation for GILON's T+0 settlement model.

§ 03.04FEMA, 1999

The Foreign Exchange Management Act — governing cross-border capital and current account transactions, permissible settlement currencies, and authorised dealer obligations.

GILON's cross-border settlement model operates within the IFSC dollar-settlement perimeter. INR flows are intermediated through AD Category I banks under extant LRS and trade-settlement regimes. All foreign exchange obligations comply with FEMA 1999 as applicable to IFSC entities.

04 · Why Now

Three forces.
One narrow window.

In payment systems, infrastructure windows close once. Volume, mandate, and regulation are converging in 2026 — the combination will not repeat this decade.

Force 01Volume
$320Bn ↑
India's services exports, 2024
Every dollar settled gross. Every leg demanding its own liquidity line across correspondent banks. The friction scales with volume — and volume is compounding.
Source
Worldline India · 2025 Report
Force 02Mandate
G20Roadmap
Multilateral netting prioritised
The G20 cross-border payments roadmap — endorsed by central banks globally — names multilateral netting as a priority action for 2025–2027. BIS Project Nexus goes live in 2026.
Source
FSB G20 Progress Report · BIS Project Nexus
Force 03Regulation
2024PSS Regs
Legal framework notified
IFSCA's Payment and Settlement Systems Regulations — notified 14 Oct 2024 — created the first dedicated legal framework for payment system operators within GIFT-IFSC. The sandbox is open.
Source
IFSCA Gazette F.No. IFSCA/GN/2024/009
The window between regulation being written and infrastructure being built is narrow. In payment systems, it closes once — and the first mover sets the standard.
GILON Working Paper  ·  2026
Tweaks